A self described \u201cNLP guy\u201d once made elBenbo an offer he could easily refuse:<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat I’d like to propose to you is a case study that can be very beneficial to both of us. Teach me your stuff, show me how to develop a saleable package, and how to market it with email and use my success in your own marketing as proof of your pudding. \ud83d\ude42 I think you can easily see how this could be a boon for you and myself, can you not?\u201d<\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n
Not really, Chuckles.<\/p>\n
Wait, was that last question NLP he was running on me?<\/p>\n
I\u2019m always amused at offers like this from various ex-spurts.<\/p>\n
I remember waaaaay back when I first published \u201cEmail Players\u201d this guy subscribed and cancelled, wrote a lame review about it (admitting he never implemented a single thing he learned) then made me an offer where I would \u201cget\u201d to write a bunch of his emails, and if they made more money than his current emails, he\u2019d pay me a percentage of the increase in sales.<\/p>\n
Mighty generous of him!<\/p>\n
But here’s the point:<\/p>\n
I often get asked for critiques and to review emails from paying \u201cEmail Players\u201d subscribers, which I don’t do either of. There are both logistical and practical reasons why – plus, I hate doing critiques anyway, and 99% of the time people don’t have a “copy” problem, but an offer or list problem that can’t be solved by a copy critique anyway. Whatever the case, those paid Email Players of the Horde members are my priority. And yet, if I won\u2019t even give their copy so much as a cursory glance… what makes these special little internet snowflakes think I\u2019m going to write copy for them or teach them something free?<\/p>\n
It takes a lot more than NLP, I\u2019m afraid.<\/p>\n
OK, enough of this clacking, on to the business.<\/p>\n
To get your hands on my non-NLP ways, go here:<\/p>\n