A question that waifts by like a stale fart in the breeze every now and then is why I don\u2019t let people pay for \u201cEmail Players\u201d for a year in one shot. After all, they have the dough, they want to give it to me, and they are even eager to do so.<\/p>\n
My reply to that?<\/p>\n
I get why people want to do that.<\/p>\n
I am the same way.<\/p>\n
But, I also don\u2019t like being in debt or buying things on time.<\/p>\n
By selling things in advance that have not been created yet, that puts a kind of psychological stress on my wee brain that sucks all the fun out of doing it for me. At that point it becomes a chore and something I have to fulfill on.<\/p>\n
Thus, my answer is always no.<\/p>\n
Think I\u2019m the only one?<\/p>\n
Think again, Buster.<\/p>\n
Even the great Terry Dean, when I interviewed him once, told me he is the same way with his newsletter. People who have been buried in a bottomless pit of debt and financial problems in our lives tend to not want more debt.<\/p>\n
Yes, even product-fulfillment debt.<\/p>\n
(i.e. such as selling yearly subscriptions.)<\/p>\n
Being bound to having to do it for a year in advance would take all the fun out of it.<\/p>\n
So anyway, for those who keep asking \u201cwhy no yearly?\u201d \u2014 now you know.<\/p>\n
And, as my pal GI Joe used to say:<\/p>\n
\u201cKnowing is half the battle\u201d<\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n
Giddy-up.<\/p>\n
To check out my *monthly* \u201cEmail Players\u201d newsletter go here:<\/p>\n