Recently, \u201cEmail Players\u201d subscriber K.G. asked:<\/p>\n
The most common objection I seem to face is (since I\u2019ve entered a new market with no prior visible presence)… \u201cIf you\u2019re so great, how come when I\u2019ve never heard of you\u201d or \u201cwhy is there nothing when I google you\u201d, \u201cwhy should I trust you\u201d, etc. The market seems to have been completely sucked of trust by ever evolving claims etc. I have some good proof, but since everyone else is using similar proof, it doesn’t have much of an impact as far as trust goes.<\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n
The answer is to use what I refer to as:<\/p>\n
“Anti-proof.”<\/p>\n
I\u2019ve never heard anyone talk about this before.<\/p>\n
But, it\u2019s something I use to the hilt whenever selling something I don\u2019t have a lot of credibility with, but that I know works, especially when dealing with hardened skeptics always looking for any whiff of an excuse to click away.<\/p>\n
The August \u201cEmail Players\u201d issue talks about this in depth on pages 18-19.<\/p>\n
The deadline to get it is tomorrow when I send it to the printer.<\/p>\n
So procrastination is not your friend if you want this issue.<\/p>\n
Go to this link right away to get in on time:<\/p>\n