{"id":5963,"date":"2013-06-21T06:00:00","date_gmt":"2013-06-21T13:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/bensettle.com\/blog\/?p=5963"},"modified":"2013-06-21T06:00:00","modified_gmt":"2013-06-21T13:00:00","slug":"the-scientific-case-against-testing-emails","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/bensettle.com\/blog\/the-scientific-case-against-testing-emails\/","title":{"rendered":"The (Scientific!) Case Against Testing Emails"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>One of my subscribers recently said she thought my daily emails are like &#8220;a giant machete slashing and hacking a safe path for her through the jungle of lies, deceit and outright <em>bullshit<\/em> surrounding the Internet.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>True dat.<\/p>\n<p>I take great pleasure in tipping sacred cows.<\/p>\n<p>One biggie is this whole idea of testing emails.<\/p>\n<p>Whenever someone says they &#8220;scientifically test&#8221; emails, I call BS on it right away.<\/p>\n<p>They may THINK they&#8217;re testing emails.<\/p>\n<p>They may be using software designed for testing emails.<\/p>\n<p>They may even think they&#8217;re getting sooper important intel from these so-called &#8220;tests.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Sorry, Chuckles.<\/p>\n<p>It just don&#8217;t work that way.<\/p>\n<p>Ain&#8217;t nobody really testing anything.<\/p>\n<p>At least, not scientifically.<\/p>\n<p>My friend Jim Yaghi (an actual scientist &#8212; he doesn&#8217;t just play one on goo-roo TV) explained it to me like this:<\/p>\n<p><strong>Most people have no clue how testing works.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Or of the rigorous discipline it takes to pull a real test off.<\/p>\n<p>A real (scientific) test is done multiple times, in a controlled environment, where there are NO changing variables. In other words&#8230; you&#8217;d have to mail the EXACT same emails, delivered to the EXACT same list, at the EXACT same day\/time, to the EXACT same device they check (i.e. phone, computer, tablet, etc) and make sure it was delivered to the EXACT same people during each test. And, you&#8217;d have to get the EXACT same results each time. Plus&#8230; everything else that could possibly affect the open rate aside from the variable of its subject has to be controlled and kept the same over all tests, too.<\/p>\n<p>(That is, if you want your test results to be genuinely reliable.)<\/p>\n<p>That&#8217;s a scientific test.<\/p>\n<p>And it&#8217;s impossible with email.<\/p>\n<p>After all, there will always be subscribers unsubscribing during the test.<\/p>\n<p>New subscribers joining.<\/p>\n<p>ISP&#8217;s blacklisting your email service.<\/p>\n<p>Servers down.<\/p>\n<p>And, people who simply didn&#8217;t check their email more than once during the test, or checked their email on a different device as they did the first time. (Not to mention if you do email right, many people will make the decision to buy 1, 2 even 3 weeks earlier, but just happened to have the $$ or be ready today &#8212; so was it today&#8217;s email or that shnazzy email you wrote 3 weeks ago&#8230; or the 10-15 accumulating emails leading up to today&#8217;s email that really made the sale? You just don&#8217;t know&#8230;)<\/p>\n<p>More:<\/p>\n<p><strong>You think you&#8217;re REALLY tracking open rates?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Not if your readers are checking their emails on phones, you&#8217;re not.<\/p>\n<p>Tracking on phones is UNRELIABLE.<\/p>\n<p>Especially when the email client only receives text emails.<\/p>\n<p>Why?<\/p>\n<p>Because tracking opens requires HTML and that the email client automatically loads images, which most (even pc ones) don&#8217;t for security sake.<\/p>\n<p>And what about clickthrus?<\/p>\n<p>What about them?<\/p>\n<p>They&#8217;re more useful than opens.<\/p>\n<p>But you&#8217;re a durned fool if you think high clickthrus equal high sales.<\/p>\n<p>Even spammers get high clickthrus, but little sales.<\/p>\n<p>Plus, if you&#8217;re tracking sales (the only thing that matters at the end of the day) and you&#8217;re using a cookie-based tracking mechanism, you&#8217;re missing a lot of data. We saw this last year several times by running solo email ads. Sales were crazy high (over 50+ more sales than usual over a week), but according to the stats we only had 11 or so sales.<\/p>\n<p>Why?<\/p>\n<p>People clicking with one device and buying with another.<\/p>\n<p>Or, maybe opting in with one email address, and buying with another.<\/p>\n<p>(Or both&#8230;)<\/p>\n<p>Anyway, the point?<\/p>\n<p>Email is not &#8220;scientific.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Never has been.<\/p>\n<p>Never will be.<\/p>\n<p>The real power is in repetition.<\/p>\n<p>In consistently sending them every day.<\/p>\n<p>And in having the right kind of conversation with your market.<\/p>\n<p>(All of which I teach in &#8220;Email Players&#8221; each month.)<\/p>\n<p>Don&#8217;t let the goo-roos intimidate you.<\/p>\n<p>Don&#8217;t let them lie to you about their &#8220;testing stats&#8221; which, even if true, are 100% irrelevant to you, your market and your product.<\/p>\n<p>And, don&#8217;t let them paralyze you with a testing complex.<\/p>\n<p>Focus on writing emails regularly.<\/p>\n<p>On doing them right (so people look forward to getting them).<\/p>\n<p>And on tracking sales trends over time &#8212; not having a cow over opens or clickthrus on any given day (which, btw, will often be LOWER if you have a smaller list and do email right anyway, but that&#8217;s another discussion for another time&#8230;)<\/p>\n<p>The rest will take care of itself.<\/p>\n<p>Alright.<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;m gonna sheathe my blood-stained machete.<\/p>\n<p>(For now&#8230;)<\/p>\n<p>To get started with email, go here:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.EmailPlayers.com\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><strong>www.EmailPlayers.com<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Ben Settle<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>One of my subscribers recently said she thought my daily emails are like &#8220;a giant machete slashing and hacking a safe path for her through the jungle of lies, deceit and outright bullshit surrounding the Internet.&#8221; True dat. I take great pleasure in tipping sacred cows. One biggie is this whole idea of testing emails. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-5963","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-email-marketing"},"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/bensettle.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5963","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/bensettle.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/bensettle.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bensettle.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bensettle.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5963"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/bensettle.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5963\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/bensettle.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5963"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bensettle.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5963"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bensettle.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5963"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}